ABSTRACT
Objectives: Data showed that during the SOVID-19 pandemic the pharmacy is the first place for patient care. The purpose was to study the awareness of pharmacists about the COVID-19 for 2021-2022 in Ukraine to provide complete and quality care. Method(s): Survey was developed to determine the level of knowledge of pharmacists regarding the main symptoms, methods of diagnosis, treatment and prevention of uncomplicated forms of the COVID-19 by using Google form. The heads of pharmacies, pharmacists in eight regions of Ukraine were involved. The research period was December 2021 - December 2022. Result(s): We received, 725 completed questionnaires from 8 regions of Ukraine, of which 69.7% were pharmacy managers, 12.0% were pharmacists, and 18.3% were intern- pharmacists. Of the surveyed pharmacists, 95% called the method of airborne transmission, but 4.7% believe that the coronavirus is transmitted by the contact-household method, and 0.3% - transmissible. We found that 100% of respondents correctly named the main indicators of the condition of a patient with the COVID-19. However, only 95.4% of pharmacists correctly defined the concept of saturation, which requires improvement of information support. For the symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated forms, 91.7% of respondents correctly determined that Paracetamol, Ibuprofen are for the symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated forms, but 8.3% of pharmacists named other drugs. Assessing the need to take antibiotics, 88.5% of pharmacists gave the correct answer, but 5.5% believe that the reason for prescribing antibiotics is an increase in body temperature, and 5.4% named a decrease in saturation, 0.6% - dry a cough, that does not meet the requirements of thee national guideleines Covid-19. Conclusion(s): We found that pharmacists are 100% well-informed with the symptoms and causes of the Covid-19. However, it is necessary to improve the provision of information about the requirements for the treatment of uncomplicated forms of Covid-19 and the dispensing of antibiotics from pharmacies.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Aim: During the coronavirus disease, a palliative approach was recommended for the management of endodontic emergencies. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of dexamethasone or ibuprofen-acetaminophen combination for pain management in endodontic emergencies. Material(s) and Method(s): One hundred and eight records of patients who presented to the emergency department with dental pain were evaluated retrospectively. Since interventional procedures were not performed during the pandemic period, Specific analgesics/antibiotics for the management of pain were preferred. A follow-up protocol with a questionnaire was developed to observe the effectiveness of palliative treatment and make changes if necessary. All participants received a questionnaire to rate the pain levels 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours after taking the drug. All data were collected from the patient file and assessed. After inclusion and exclusion criteria, 32 patients were included (n = 19, ibuprofen + acetaminophen;n = 13, dexamethasone). Data were analyzed using the chi-square test (P = 0.05). Result(s): In both groups, a significant decrease in pain was experienced immediately after medication and at 6, 12, and 18 hours, with no significant difference (P >.05). However, dexamethasone (Group II) resulted in lower pain levels than ibuprofen\acetaminophen (Group I) at 24 and 48 hours (P <.05) Discussion: Both dexamethasone and ibuprofen-acetaminophen can be good palliative choices in endodontic emergencies in pandemic conditions. However, at 24 and 48 hours, dexamethasone resulted in lower pain levels.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Managing patients with cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been challenging. Disruptions in cancer management have been observed due to cancellation of treatment, issues related to commuting, and dearth of health-care workers. Objective(s): This study was conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and was aimed at evaluating the 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with cancer and COVID-19 infection and the factors affecting it. Material(s) and Method(s): In this retrospective study, we collected secondary data from nine tertiary care centers in South India over a period of 10 months from March to Dec 2020. Patients across all age groups with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer who were affected by COVID-19 during their evaluation or treatment were included in the study. The primary outcome variables of the present study were 30-day all-cause mortality, cancer outcomes, and COVID-19 outcomes. Result(s): A total of 206 patients were included. Median age of the cohort was 55.5 years, and the male-To-female ratio was 1:1.03. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.6%. Twenty-Two patients (10.7%) had severe COVID-19 infection at the initial presentation. Predictors for severe pneumonia at the initial presentation were incomplete remission at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and palliative intent of treatment. Severe pneumonia at the initial presentation, diagnosis of COVID-19 on or before August 2020, and need for ventilator support were associated with increased mortality. Conclusion(s): Severity of infection at the initial presentation, cancer status, and the intent of cancer treatment impact COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer.Copyright © 2022 Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Surgical treatment of rectal cancer depends on clinical stage, size and location of primary tumor. A sphincter preserving technique such as low anterior resection (LAR) is the preferred method if negative distal margin can be achieved. If an adequate distal margin cannot be obtained, an abdominoperineal resection (APR) is required. A proctosigmoidectomy (Hartmann's procedure) is performed in patients with potentially curable obstructing rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or as a palliative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Aim(s): The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of COVID 19 pandemic on the number and type of surgeries performed for the treatment of rectal cancer in UHC Zagreb, Department of Surgery. Material(s) and Method(s): Collected data were extracted from medical records of the patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Surgery from 1st of January 2016 to 31st of December 2022 with prior Ethics Committee approval. Total of 688 patients were included. Retrospective analysis of number and type of surgery was done consecutively by years for the period of interest. Result(s): In 2016 total of 75 patients underwent elective surgery for rectal cancer. LAR was performed in 64% (N=48) of patients, Hartmann's procedure in 20% (N=15), and APR in 16% (N=12). In 2017, 94 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 64% (N=60), Hartmann's procedure 17% (N=16), and APR 19% (N=18). In 2018, 115 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 69% (N=79), Hartmann's procedure 10% (N=12), and APR 21% (N=24). In 2019, 80 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 67% (N=54), Hartmann's procedure 9% (N=80), and APR 24%. In 2020, 78 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 59% (N=46), Hartmann's procedure 14% (N=11), and APR 27% (N=21). In 2021, 124 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 66% (N=82), Hartmann's procedure 14% (N=17), and APR 20% (N=25). In 2022, 122 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 64% (N=78), Hartmann's procedure 15% (N=18), and APR 21% (N=26). Conclusion(s): Our results show steady growth in numbers of performed surgeries in the years prior to the pandemic, with exception of the year 2019 when our department underwent organizational changes. In 2020, significant decrease in number of surgeries was observed as a result of restrictive epidemiological measures established to reduce the spread of COVID 19 infection. COVID 19 pandemic measures also resulted in delayed diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer which is indirectly shown through the increasing share of Hartmann's procedure. In the years following the relaxation of measures, significant increase in number of performed surgeries that exceeded all the pre-pandemic years was recorded. Constant elevated share of Hartmann's procedure was noted as possible consequence of post COVID delay in diagnosis and confirmation of rectal cancer in more advanced stages of disease.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with cancer are vulnerable to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given the rising number of COVID-19 cases and relaxation of stringent COVID-19 protocols, assessment of the level of protective immunity to COVID-19 in patients with cancer has assumed importance. Objective(s): Our primary objective was to evaluate the seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in patients with cancer. Material(s) and Method(s): We conducted a cross-sectional study on 100 patients with solid tumors attending our Oncology Department at the Believers Church Medical College, Kerala, India, between December 2020 and June 2021. Seroprevalence was assessed using the VITROS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG test (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY, USA). Additionally, we assessed the factors associated with seropositivity and collected data regarding the general experience of patients with cancer during the pandemic. Result(s): The median age of the participants was 62 years (IQR, 53-69.8);52 (52%) were males. The seroprevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was 11% (95% CI, 4.8-17.1). Age < 50 years was the only factor that was significantly associated with a higher rate of COVID-19 antibodies (77% vs 8.9% in patients >= 50 years;P = 0.007), and sex, smoking, and the use of alcohol did not show any association. The majority (77/100, 77%) of the patients were worried about contracting COVID-19 infection;some even deferred cancer-directed treatment because of the fear of visiting health care settings. Conclusion(s): Low seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in unvaccinated patients with cancer is a matter of concern as it indicates that many of these patients are still vulnerable to infection. There is an urgent need to continue implementing strict safety measures in oncology centers and to encourage widespread COVID-19 vaccination to prevent the uncontrolled spread of COVID-19 among patients with cancer. (Funded by the institution, Believers Church Medical College, Kerala).Copyright © 2023 Neurology India, Neurological Society of India Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
ABSTRACT
Background: A need exists for safe, affordable, and effective antiviral treatments for less severe COVID-19 outpatients that can prevent infection progression, hospitalization, and death;shorten the time to clinical recovery;and reduce transmission. In our best knowledge, there are not, so far, costeffectiveness analysis on oral antiviral COVID-19 drugs in Spain. In our study we aim to evaluate cost-effectiveness of oral nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir in COVID-19 mild to moderate outpatients with at least one risk factor for disease progression in Spain. Method(s): A simulation model was constructed in R, to assess the clinical consequences and costs associated with COVID-19 in a hypothetical cohort of non-hospitalized patients older than 65 years with mild-to-moderate COVID and at least one risk factor for progression in Spain. The intervention assessed was nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir 300 mg plus 100mg every 12 hours up to 5 days. The comparator was symptomatic treatment with no antiviral drugs against SARSCoV- 2. The study was contextualized in the Spanish National Health System and the perspective of the service provider was adopted. Quality of life adjusted life years (QALYs) was used as a measure of effectiveness. Drug effectiveness was obtained from a literature review. As a cost measure, the retail price of the drugs was used. As a threshold willing to pay, the Spanish Gross National Product per capita was used. A discount of 3% per year was applied on future health effects. We used a decisional tree model. A univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Result(s): We found that nirmatrelvir/ritonavir yielded an extra 620.89 QALYs compared to a baseline scenario without it, at an increase in cost of 89,630,442 with an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 144,356.4 /QALY gained. One way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte-Carlo simulations were undertaken and showed that the probability of not being costeffective was 1 at the current price and willingness to pay threshold. To meet our willingness to pay threshold, nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir 5-days treatment price should be lowered down to 70 . Conclusion(s): According to our analysis nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is not costeffective in in the Spanish National Health System for outpatients older than 65 years with at least one risk factor for COVID progression. A drug price of 70 per treatment would meet our willingness to pay threshold.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study: The regional NICU is an essential healthcare resource for families of newborns with serious life-threatening illnesses. Mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular therapies, therapeutic hypothermia, and neonatal surgeries are common life-sustaining interventions. Our NICU serves an underprivileged population in a resource poor environment and several ethical questions frequently emerge when facing extremes of innovative therapies. The pandemic and rapidly changing institutional protocols accentuated challenges faced by frontline NICU teams caring for newborns at risk for devastating illnesses and death. Concurrently, evolving paradigms in neonatal ethics required urgent and high quality palliative care in a background of racial and socioeconomic inequities, restrictive visitation policies, and limited healthcare resources. The purpose of this study was to ensure that neonates and their families receive ethically sound care, timely referrals for innovative therapies, and specialized palliative care in the strained and uncertain environment of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Used: The key steps consisted of structured and impromptu discussion forums for specialized palliative care and medical ethics, perinatal case conferences and pediatrics grand rounds on virtual platforms, educational webinars for interdisciplinary teams, and improved electronic communication. Online collaboration and innovative combinations of in-person and virtual meetings were utilized for urgently Incorporating clinical updates. Summary of Results: 1. A neonate with severe HIE and postnatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia required emergent ECMO center referral. NICU providers utilized a structured bioethics and palliative care framework for providing family support and discussing the prognostication challenges of acute illnesses. 2. Many important bioethical questions emerged while caring for infants with life-threatening chromosomal abnormalities. Ethical tension was addressed by teaching tools, quality of life and pediatrics ethics conversations, mitigation of moral distress, contemporary clinical and surgical experience, community engagement, and family perspectives. 3. Ethical conflicts are central in the decision to resuscitate neonates born between 22 and 23 weeks of gestation. To provide urgent prenatal consultations and attend high risk deliveries, we collaborated across geographically distant healthcare systems, unified management strategies and analyzed outcomes data. 4. NEC in several extremely preterm babies had devastating outcomes and the team respected each family's voice with compassionate, shared decision-making for both curative care surgeries and palliative care. Conclusion(s): The new workflows, telephone and video conferences, and redirection to telehealth based family meetings did not change important outcomes during the pandemic. Advocacy and education for integrating bioethics and palliative care were vital facets of neonatal critical care in a resource poor and ever-changing pandemic environment.
ABSTRACT
Understanding patients' wishes regarding organ and tissue donation is an important aspect of advance care planning (ACP). Many patients with life-limiting illnesses are still eligible to be corneal donors. A quality improvement (QI) approach has promoted a positive change in culture at an inpatient hospice, making the discussion of patients' wishes on corneal donation the norm. This cultural change led to a sustained high rate of such discussions, despite the multitude of challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © Royal College of Physicians 2023. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: Self-management is considered important in people with pulmonary fibrosis (PF);however, components of self-management that are relevant to PF are not well defined. This study aimed to identify the common self-management components used in PF. Method(s): A scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework database (doi: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EUZ6S). A systematic search was conducted on August 16, 2022, using five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials). Search results were screened and studies were included if they (i) described any educational, behavioural and support components that aimed at facilitating self-management;(ii) involved adults with PF;and (iii) employed quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods. Two researchers performed record screening and data extraction independently followed by discussions of discrepancies. Result(s): Of the 27081 records screened, 87 studies were included (39% observational studies, 26% randomised controlled trials). The most common self-management components were patient education (78%), information or support for managing physical symptoms (66%) and enhancing psychosocial wellbeing (54%). Majority of the included studies (71%) were rehabilitation programs with evidence of self-management training such as home exercise program and breathing training. Other studies included palliative care programs consisting of components such as patient education and care goal setting (12%), support programs for managing medication (4%), home-based self-monitoring training (4%), disease management programs (4%), mindfulness-focused stress reduction program (1%), telemedicine service delivered during the COVID-19 outbreak that included strategies to prevent infections and self-monitoring of clinical parameters (1%) and PF-specific educational and support website (1%). Over half of the interventions were provided by a multidisciplinary team. Conclusion(s): This review identified the common components used to promote self-management in PF. These findings help to guide the development of optimal interventions to support self-management in PF.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, visiting policies in various healthcare centres across the world have changed. Visiting patients by relatives and friends have been stopped or significantly limited. New conditions and legal constraints for family visits had to be implemented also at in-patient palliative care settings, even though accompanying a dying person is crucial for the quality of the end of life. The study aimed to identify and review the visiting policies at in-patient specialist palliative care settings across Central and Eastern Europe. Patients and Methods: The study was conducted one year after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak from May to October 2021. Information about visiting policies, published on official websites of the in-patient specialised palliative care settings (stationary hospices and hospital-based palliative care units) from Central and Eastern European countries, were identified and categorised. The websites which lacked information about visiting policy during the COVID-19 pandemic were excluded. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the obtained data was conducted by using content analysis techniques and descriptive analysis. The content from websites was translated into Polish with the usage of the Google Translate machine tool. Result(s): Data from 55 in-patient palliative care settings from 8 countries were collected and analysed (83.6% from Poland, and the other from Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine). In 43.6% of the organisations, visits were stopped and 56.4% of settings published information about the special requirements for visiting arrangements. In 32.7% of all examined units upfront approval from a physician or the head of a department for visiting a patient was required, and 29.1% published information about personal protective equipment. 32.7% of organizations recommended telephone contact with the patient, and 12.7% provided video calls. Conclusion(s): Web information regarding visiting patients in in-patient palliative care settings is limited. There is a need to establish detailed requirements for the visits with better access to the website for the visitors, in case of a global disease outbreak.Copyright © Via Medica, ISSN 2545-0425, e-ISSN: 2545-1359.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The health care offered to children and adolescents with cancer has been expanded, giving space to orthothanasia and palliative care, with a comprehensive look at the subject facing the threat to the continuity of life, as well as challenging professionals to access issues related to grief. Objective(s): In order to explore this reality, this study intended to analyze how professionals experience grieving processes in the exercise of palliative care in pediatric oncology. Method(s): A qualitative research was conducted with the participation of 23 health professionals working in palliative oncology and pediatric care, who responded to a semi-structured interview script, whose analyses were performed with the support of the IRaMuTeQ (Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires) software. Result(s): The results were organized in four classes: in class 1, the specificities of the treatment of children with cancer and other aspects related to chronic illness are portrayed;class 2 shows that health trainings do not prepare professionals to deal with death and with patients with no possibility of cure, and these professionals have (pre-) concepts about palliative care;class 3 highlights the principles of palliative care and other factors of the work in this therapy;and class 4 deals with the bonds formed by professionals and their grieving experiences. Conclusion(s): Cure must not be a requirement for the provision of care in relation to children with cancer that can benefit from the adoption of palliative care therapy and the validation of the sensitivity of professionals.Copyright © 2023, Universidad Compultense Madrid. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cyclophosphamide (Cy) is used in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) preparative regimens and lymphodepletion for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. We describe a case of cyclophosphamide hypersensitivity in a pediatric patient during CAR-T therapy. Case description: A 13 year old boy was diagnosed with very high risk ALL in 2015 and had 2 isolated CNS relapses treated with intensified chemotherapy (chemo) and cranial radiation (1st relapse) and Blinatumomab with intrathecal (IT) chemo followed by sibling donor HSCT (2nd relapse). At age 19, and 18 months after HSCT, he had a 3rd CNS relapse treated with IT chemo and referral for CAR-T therapy. At our center, leukapheresis and CAR-T production (Novartis) were performed. Later, during lymphodepletion with fludarabine (Flu) and Cy, physiologic replacement hydrocortisone (HC) was briefly held to prevent interference with CAR-T function. After 3 days of Flu/Cy, he developed fever and hypotension requiring inotropic support. Hypotension and fever resolved with stress dose HC and antibiotics and was attributed to culture-negative sepsis and adrenal crisis. CAR-T infusion was subsequently delayed by skin GVHD requiring glucocorticoids and COVID-19 infection treated with convalescent plasma and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Physiologic HC replacement was continued when he was re-admitted for CAR-T therapy, but he again developed fever, diffuse erythema and shock in hours following the first dose of Cy necessitating stress dose HC, antibiotics, inotropes, and mechanical ventilation. Negative blood cultures and ongoing physiologic HC replacement suggested an alternative explanation for shock. Case reports of anaphylaxis to Cy metabolites implicated Cy as the causative agent so it was discontinued. After recovery, CAR-T cells were infused without complications. In the following weeks, he had no evidence of recurrent leukemia but was persistently pancytopenic. A sibling donor stem cell boost was proposed but the patient accepted only palliative care. He had several opportunistic infections before succumbing to E. coli sepsis. Discussion(s): The first episode of shock was initially attributed to adrenal crisis and sepsis, although no organism was identified. The second episode appeared anaphylactic in timing and clinical presentation with adequate HC replacement and negative cultures, suggesting Type I hypersensitivity. The patient previously received Cy uneventfully before HSCT, suggesting that the donor-derived immune system was the source of new Cy hypersensitivity. Onset of anaphylaxis within hours rather than minutes after Cy administration supports hypersensitivity to Cy metabolites rather than to the drug itself. This case highlights the importance of consideration of sensitivity to Cy metabolites as well as acquired donor-specific allergy even when alternative explanations are likely.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus pandemic in 2019 led India to implement a complete lockdown except for essential services. Cancer patients faced hindrances in seeking medical help. This caused stress and worry, leading to reduced quality of life (QoL). This study evaluated QoL and pain management in palliative care cancer patients during the lockdown. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study at a tertiary cancer hospital, over one month period with convenience sampling. Participants included all who were unable to visit the palliative outpatient department during the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. They were contacted telephonically and a valid QoL questionnaire was filled out. Disease, demographic details and pain were assessed. Result(s): A total of 51 were interviewed, 45% (n = 23) patients reported difficult access to medication during the lockdown;18 (35.3%) required morphine to alleviate pain and 6 (33.33%) faced difficulty in acquiring morphine tablets. QoL scores did not differ based on access to morphine (p = 0.648). Mean QoL scores were 12.7 +/- 3.76 and 15.0 +/- 3.60 amongst patients who did not have access to other medications and those who did have access, respectively (p = 0.03). Overall QoL FACT G7 mean score was 14 +/- 3.8. The variables NRS (pain intensity) and QoL scores were found to be negatively correlated (Pearson's Correlation Coefficient: r (49) = -0.69, p < 0.00001). Conclusion(s): Evaluation of QoL of palliative care cancer patients during global crises plays an important role in the assessment of patients' overall condition as well as to maintain a continuum of care.Copyright © Via Medica.